The War on Drugs and Modern Mass Incarceration

The War on Drugs, initiated in the 1970s and escalated in the 1980s under President Reagan, marked one of the most significant periods of mass incarceration in American history. Harsh drug laws, including mandatory minimum sentencing and three-strikes laws, led to a dramatic increase in incarceration rates, particularly for nonviolent drug offenses. Policies such as the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 imposed much harsher penalties for crack cocaine possession—predominantly affecting Black communities—compared to powder cocaine, which was more commonly associated with white, affluent users. This sentencing disparity contributed to the racialized mass incarceration crisis that continues to shape the U.S. justice system today.

As a result, the prison population skyrocketed, disproportionately affecting Black and Latino communities. Private prisons began to expand, profiting from the surge in inmate populations, and policymakers continued to push for tough-on-crime legislation despite evidence that these policies were ineffective at reducing drug use. The War on Drugs not only fueled mass incarceration but also created lasting economic and social consequences, making it harder for justice-involved individuals to reintegrate into society. Even as sentencing reforms have been introduced in recent years, the damage caused by decades of aggressive drug enforcement policies remains deeply embedded in the criminal justice system.

Key Points:

  • Disproportionate Targeting: Both eras saw policies that primarily affected communities of color.
  • Economic Exploitation: Convict leasing profited from forced labor; today, incarcerated individuals often face economic exploitation through prison labor.
  • Entrenched Systemic Racism: Discriminatory laws in both periods have contributed to long-lasting racial disparities in the criminal justice system.
  • Use of Legal Loopholes: Just as post-Civil War laws exploited legal loopholes to re-enslave Black individuals, modern drug laws utilize vague or overly harsh statutes to maintain control over marginalized populations.

Calls to Action Poll

Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
Peer mentor training
Group facilitator training
Crisis responder training
Toolkits or educational resources
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
Templates for operations (e.g., reports, outreach plans)
Apps for scheduling, communication, or service delivery
Centralized platforms or systems to manage services
Tech literacy and support for RCO staff/volunteers
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
Public education materials about recovery
Anti-stigma messaging and campaigns
Community presentations or media outreach
Engagement with schools, employers, and faith-based organizations
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
Transitional or supportive housing models
Second-chance hiring programs
Job training and resume support
Partnerships with local employers
Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
Volunteer recruitment and engagement
Matching professional skills (e.g., legal, marketing) with org needs
Platform or system to manage and track volunteer involvement
Training and orientation tools for volunteers